Skip to main content ↑ ↓

Notice

Please note that most of the software linked on this forum is likely to be safe to use. If you are unsure, feel free to ask in the relevant topics, or send a private message to an administrator or moderator. To help curb the problems of false positives, or in the event that you do find actual malware, you can contribute through the article linked here.
Topic: Ripping & managing my music collection (Read 5717 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Ripping & managing my music collection

I'm going away to Uni in September and don't plan to take all my CDs with me, so was planning to rip them to my external hard drive and take them with me.

I've got around 200-odd CDs, and about 5000 songs already on the hard drive

I'm currently using MediaMonkey 3 (free version) with the LAME 3.97 encoder. I'm on Windows XP (though will be moving to a Vista laptop) and want to use MP3 as it's more compatible with my portable media players

1) It seems to take a lot longer to rip using mediamonkey than with WMP11, at the same quality (192kbps MP3), is there an advantage to doing it using mediamonkey?

2) Is mediamonkey the best program to use to manage that number of files?

3) Any other tips?

Thanks for all your help 

Ripping & managing my music collection

Reply #1 –
1) wmp nor mediamonkey are the best choice for rippping
use eac instead ( secure mode)

2) no, foobar is the best ( mediamonkey is slow)
Music is my first love.

Ripping & managing my music collection

Reply #3 –
Quote from: Nick E on
Quote from: lycanthropy on


3) Any other tips?


There are advantages to using VBR rather than a constant bitrate.  Suggested settings for LAME, depending on what purpose the encoding are for are given here:

http://wiki.hydrogenaudio.org/index.php?title=LAME


And is VBR pretty futureproof?

I want to encode in a format that I can transfer to an MP3 player easily and that won't become out of date

I currently use a Sony NWZ A818

Ripping & managing my music collection

Reply #4 –
Quote from: lycanthropy on
Quote from: Nick E on

Quote from: lycanthropy on


3) Any other tips?


There are advantages to using VBR rather than a constant bitrate.  Suggested settings for LAME, depending on what purpose the encoding are for are given here:

http://wiki.hydrogenaudio.org/index.php?title=LAME


And is VBR pretty futureproof?

I want to encode in a format that I can transfer to an MP3 player easily and that won't become out of date

I currently use a Sony NWZ A818



Well, VBR is part of MP3 standard, and I am not aware of any modern player (software or hardware) that has any problems playing VBR streams.

Ripping & managing my music collection

Reply #5 –
I've picked up dirt cheap mp3 players from discount bins - all play vbr. If vbr allergic device exists, Ring the manufacturer and give them a mouthfull like " CBR ? wakeup  this isn' t 1998  !.."

Ripping & managing my music collection

Reply #6 –
Yeah, as the other poster says any modern player will be fine.  It's rather the other way round: that if you have a really old player it might have problems with VBR.

But going forwards VBR is better, since it gives you more bang for your buck -- which is to say better sound quality for the filesize.  Amazon is, apparently, using it for some of its DRM-free downloads, which is a pretty good indication that almost no one is going to have problems playing the files back:

http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index....showtopic=62092
 

Ripping & managing my music collection

Reply #7 –
Thanks a lot, I'm now using foobar, although it's a bit daunting to start using!

I've managed to get it to a stage I like though, although any tips would be appreciated!

Ripping & managing my music collection

Reply #8 –
Quote from: Melomane on
1) wmp nor mediamonkey are the best choice for rippping
use eac instead ( secure mode)


Or dbpoweramp r12 or r13.

Quote
2) no, foobar is the best ( mediamonkey is slow)


Disagree on both statement.

I use MM on 1+ tb of mixed flac/mp3 and it works fine.

Don't get me wrong, I like and use foobar for some things, but 'best' is definately in the eyes of the user and the situation. And I'm not saying MM is perfect either.

Ripping & managing my music collection

Reply #9 –
Well, it depends of how large your music collection is. I just assume Melomane is right about foobar2000 being faster than Mediamonkey... now if you only got a few hundred or thousand files, then it might not be a problem. But when your collection goes into 10,000s it's when many music managers miserably fail. foobar2000 however has no problems with a very large database, something I actually do know for sure.