HydrogenAudio

Lossless Audio Compression => FLAC => Topic started by: PVNC on 2004-03-08 01:10:33

Title: (-) Ions: FLAC, LAME 3.90.3, 3.96b1
Post by: PVNC on 2004-03-08 01:10:33
Here is a 28-second sample from Tool's track (-) Ions.  I chose this to test first, as it gets an average bitrate of 384 kbps using Vorbis GT3b1 at q5.

Original sample is in FLAC format.

I encoded mp3 versions using only the commandline --alt-preset 128 in RazorLame.  I used LAME 3.90.3 modified and 3.96b1.

FLAC and mp3 versions have ReplayGain information applied.

EDIT:  This is my first attempt at testing LAME 3.96b1 against 3.90.3 modified.  I noticed a different main artifact, depending on which version of LAME I used.

If anyone would like, they can post their comments about 3.90.3 and 3.96 encodings of this sampe in the LAME 3.96b regression examples (http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=19441&) thread.
Title: (-) Ions: FLAC, LAME 3.90.3, 3.96b1
Post by: indybrett on 2004-03-08 01:15:30
So, what are we suppose to be looking for here? If you want to compare bitrates to Vorbis, then you should use VBR, not ABR.
Title: (-) Ions: FLAC, LAME 3.90.3, 3.96b1
Post by: PVNC on 2004-03-08 01:17:43
Sorry, this is in reference to this thread (http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=19441&).

The only reason I mentioned Vorbis at all is that is how I realized that this track is such a problem case.  I should have made that clear in my first post.  Sorry again.