Skip to main content

Notice

Please note that most of the software linked on this forum is likely to be safe to use. If you are unsure, feel free to ask in the relevant topics, or send a private message to an administrator or moderator. To help curb the problems of false positives, or in the event that you do find actual malware, you can contribute through the article linked here.
Topic: frank klemm\'s mppenc doesn\'t flex so low, why? (Read 4390 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

frank klemm\'s mppenc doesn\'t flex so low, why?

the old mppenc 1.79c flexes very low sometimes (for example: portishead - sour times 96kb/s avg. or tricky - hell is round the corner 88kb/s avg.). the bitrate stays much higher using mppenc 0.90s (sour times 144kb/s avg. ). i wonder why there is this huge differenc, as bouth encoders use the same psychoacoustics.

regards; ilikedirt

frank klemm\'s mppenc doesn\'t flex so low, why?

Reply #1
You are mistaken with Sour Times (from the album Dummy). I checked using 1.7.9c and 0.90s both with standard profile. The MPC files both have an avg. bitrate of 144.

frank klemm\'s mppenc doesn\'t flex so low, why?

Reply #2
if the file is a mono file, the bitrate will be a lot less...

perhaps somehow the other test file got made into mono?

frank klemm\'s mppenc doesn\'t flex so low, why?

Reply #3
your right, i was mistaken. i checked it and bouth files result in an avg. bitrage of 144. just wondered, why the file i encoded some time ago was so much lower.

don't think the file got into mono as i usually ripped it and did not use any commline switches.

regards; ilikedirt

ps: tricky - hell is round the courner still results in 88kb/s with bouth encoders.

frank klemm\'s mppenc doesn\'t flex so low, why?

Reply #4
its not the bitrate that really matters though... as long as it sounds good...

frank klemm\'s mppenc doesn\'t flex so low, why?

Reply #5
My guess is that the Tricky song is mono. I have some jazz CD's from the fifties/sixties and they are also mono. Encoded with MPC standard they also have a bitrate of 85-90.

frank klemm\'s mppenc doesn\'t flex so low, why?

Reply #6
Nope, I have an older copy of Portishead done with Buschel's encoder, back before they implemented the standard and xtreme data saved into tags, and mine displays as 98Kbps average.  I have, um... "lost" the CD and can't re-encode to see what I'd get now.  The file is most certainly stereo.  My guess would be vastly changed defaults since the file was encoded, though I do everything at xtreme these days just for fun.