Skip to main content ↑ ↓

Notice

Please note that most of the software linked on this forum is likely to be safe to use. If you are unsure, feel free to ask in the relevant topics, or send a private message to an administrator or moderator. To help curb the problems of false positives, or in the event that you do find actual malware, you can contribute through the article linked here.
Topic: [USELESS] From: Apple Lossless vs FLAC: The better? (Read 2434 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

[USELESS] From: Apple Lossless vs FLAC: The better?

Quote from: Billytheonion on
You're still looking at it from the eyes of a selected few people.


It is you who should look at it without your fanboi glasses.

[USELESS] From: Apple Lossless vs FLAC: The better?

Reply #1 –
Billytheonion Troll

[USELESS] From: Apple Lossless vs FLAC: The better?

Reply #2 –
Quote from: jcoalson on
Why then would the Beatles, the Rolling Stones, Metallica, etc etc etc be selling FLAC but not ALAC?  The most successful acts of all time would have to be grossly misinformed about their fans if ALAC were important.


This is a very good point.

[USELESS] From: Apple Lossless vs FLAC: The better?

Reply #3 –
I don't use any form of lossless and don't own any iDevice i rip everything to 256 AAC. I'm not worried or for a second telling anyone to use a particular format everyone should use what they feel suits them best.

[USELESS] From: Apple Lossless vs FLAC: The better?

Reply #4 –
Im no i-boy or lossless fan. I have no iDevices and don't use lossless at all, ripped all my cd's at 256 AAC.

I'm not worried or for a second trying to tell anyone what they should use, everyone should use what they feel suits them best.

[USELESS] From: Apple Lossless vs FLAC: The better?

Reply #5 –
Is it that my posts are getting deleted ?  we can't have a discussion ?  if this is the case.  POOR

[USELESS] From: Apple Lossless vs FLAC: The better?

Reply #6 –
A blind Fanboy ? i-boy ? how did you people come to this conclusion ?  I don't own any iDevice, and i don't use ALAC.

We are here just giving our opinions why we think a particular format is is better to use. No one is forcing anyone to use a particular format it's up to one to decide what suits them best.

[USELESS] From: Apple Lossless vs FLAC: The better?

Reply #7 –
Quote from: Billytheonion on
A blind Fanboy ? i-boy ? how did you people come to this conclusion ?  I don't own any iDevice, and i don't use ALAC.

We are here just giving our opinions why we think a particular format is is better to use.


In one of your deleted posts you also say you don't use lossless at all.

So overall your posts in this thread have been like a celebate giving advice on sex based on his imaginings.

[USELESS] From: Apple Lossless vs FLAC: The better?

Reply #8 –
If one uses lossless or not  whats that got to do with it.  You saying that almost all posts on this forum about ALAC are based on imagination, since most here don't use it? So almost all advice given regarding ALAC should be ignored on these forums, since most people don't use it.

[USELESS] From: Apple Lossless vs FLAC: The better?

Reply #9 –
flame thread and moderators are not objective

[USELESS] From: Apple Lossless vs FLAC: The better?

Reply #10 –
Quote from: hidn on
... moderators are not objective

?!
I challenge you to demonstrate a failure in objectivity amongst the moderator postings in this thread.  Or are you just adding your flame to the fire?
Creature of habit.

[USELESS] From: Apple Lossless vs FLAC: The better?

Reply #11 –
"soap" it must be funny? i mean "soap".