Skip to main content

Notice

Please note that most of the software linked on this forum is likely to be safe to use. If you are unsure, feel free to ask in the relevant topics, or send a private message to an administrator or moderator. To help curb the problems of false positives, or in the event that you do find actual malware, you can contribute through the article linked here.

Poll

Based on QUALITY only (not filesize), which encoder is the best?

aoTuV beta 4.51
[ 11 ] (68.8%)
aoTuV beta 4 ( 20050617)
[ 0 ] (0%)
Lancer 20060331(Based on aotuv-b4.51_20051117)
[ 4 ] (25%)
libVorbis v1.1.2
[ 1 ] (6.3%)
Xiph.Org libVorbis I 20040920
[ 0 ] (0%)
Xiph.Org libVorbis I 20040629
[ 0 ] (0%)
Lancer [20051121] (Based on aotuv-b4.51_20051117)
[ 0 ] (0%)
older Tuned up versions, pls state
[ 0 ] (0%)
early official Xiph releases, pls state
[ 0 ] (0%)
other(new, self-compiled... pls state)
[ 0 ] (0%)

Total Members Voted: 39

Topic: Quality of vorbis Encoders (Read 4701 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Quality of vorbis Encoders

Can anyone notice the quality difference betwween Vorbis lancer, aotuv and official encoder?

And how to optimize the quality of OGG encoders, is it related to the trigger profile, how to set it for MAX quality?

looking for answer

Correction to title::

SELECTION of vorbis Encoders

Quality of vorbis Encoders

Reply #1
First read this: http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index....showtopic=15049

Second. How do you suppose to determine Ogg Vorbis best version by this poll??? ABX test should be done.

Regarding optimized versions: encodings of Lancer version and original aoTuV version differ due different rounding accuracy. It can become a pain in the ass if you are going to calculate Pluto's trajectory, but it is not worth anxiety with LOSSY music encoding.
Ogg Vorbis for music and speech [q-2.0 - q6.0]
FLAC for recordings to be edited
Speex for speech

Quality of vorbis Encoders

Reply #2
I agree with de Mon. I don't think anything valid can come out of a poll like this. This whole thing doesn't make sense without a proper listening test. Furthermore one would have to take into account various bitrates.

The only thing this could lead to is to people drawing the wrong conclusions out of this.

Quality of vorbis Encoders

Reply #3
Lancer builds are also exactly the same quality as the aoTuV builds they're based off. They're just much faster at encodnig.

And I do agree that this poll is useless as far as rating audio quality goes. The only useful thing is to say which one is faster, and well, lancer takes the crown by far...

Quality of vorbis Encoders

Reply #4
I understand the imroptance of ABX tests, but it seems to me that this poll is the easiest way to get some concept, i have no time & equippment for ABXing

 

Quality of vorbis Encoders

Reply #5
This is an invitation to commit mass TOS 8 violations. Thread closed.