Altmann Tera Player (and light model)
Reply #14 – 2015-02-16 05:03:57
It is a big step financially, and the circus surrounding Tera adds even more confusion. For those willing to embrace its obvious screen, impedance and .wav peculiarities however, you won't find a single naysayer. See my signature.I use 1964Ears Quads for a great sound, and amp with a Portaphile 627x when in the car, airplane, or other headphones. If one thinks of Tera as primarily a kick butt DAC which can be used with Some headphones without an amp it will be sure to please. My Quads absolutely rock straight up, but adding the $500 amp is a nice touch still. A "DAC" which for some reason uses a microprocessor, even though it has no screen, and only supports WAV. A "DAC" which uses lo-fi R2R technology. A "DAC" which needs an extra amp to fix its broken output impedance. Sounds like a sound investment.It has an enchanting effect which I've only experienced in the past on $50,000 digital home units and turntables. That much was obvious. Maybe I should add "and expensive" to my signature, but who am I to tell people what they are allowed to waste their money on.So there's my explanation of this niche product, but I'd add that I have an additional fascination. How many notable products are the fruit of just one inventor? Agreed. It's still not technicaly sound, though. If the Altman guy was honest he'd say that this was a hobby project of his, and he tried out how to build an audio player by himself, which is no small feat. Claiming that this thing is in any way high-fidelity is ludicrous.